Reliability Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Reliability Discussion Forum > Reliability Discussion Forums > General Reliability Discussion > Ask Members for Help

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd, 2006, 08:32 PM
Steve Steve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 32
Default A problem with MTBF and cost....

Here is a problem I have found to be particularly disturbing since I believe the "official" answer to be wrong. Take a look and see what you think:

"You are considering the purchase of an piece of equipment for your company. Two are available. Unit A costs $150,000 and has an expected life of 20 years with a MTBF of 5 years. Unit B costs $141,000 and has an expected life of 15 years and a MTBF of 3 years. The expected cost of repair for each unit is $1,000. Assuming that there is no value at the end of the life and interest rate is 12%, which unit has the lowest life-cycle cost?"

Take a shot at it and see what you get. I got something different than what is said to be the "correct" answer, and I think that it is wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 14th, 2006, 09:48 PM
Steve Steve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 32
Default Re: A problem with MTBF and cost....

Okay, with everybody clamoring to get the right answer, I suppose I should reveal what it is:

Either. Supposedly.

Total Life-Cycle Cost is: $25,650 for Unit A and $26,586.67.

My question is, what do I do when Unit B fails in the 15th year? I can either do without it or buy a new one. And yet, the "official" answer ignores this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 15th, 2006, 12:14 PM
Tarik El-Azzouzi Tarik El-Azzouzi is offline
ReliaSoft Support
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 170
Default Re: A problem with MTBF and cost....

System A is expected to fail (on average) every 5 years
and costs 1000$ for each failure. After 20 years, it will cost 150,000$ to purchase a new one. It will once again start failing every 5 years

System B is expected to fail (on average) every 3 years
and costs 1000$ for each failure. After 15 years, it will cost 141,000$ to purchase a new one. It will once again start failing every 3 years.

If you want to compare the 2 systems, you need to pick a certian mission period or operation period (for example 20 years) and consider the systems' overhall costs and apply the interest rate you mentioned to obtain the current value of money.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 18th, 2006, 07:08 AM
Rui Assis Rui Assis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 33
Default Re: A problem with MTBF and cost....

Steve,

I would like to add the following comment to what Tarik said:

If you intend to stop the business as soon as the equipment reaches its useful life (regardless of which equipment you decided upon), then, use the present worth as the decision criteria – in which case alternative B is the best choice (despite the difference is minimal). If that is not the case and the business must go on, then, use the annual worth as the criteria – in which case you pick up the alternative A (despite the difference is again minimal).

I attach an Excel file with the calculus.

Regards,

Rui
Attached Files
File Type: zip Reliasoft_Steve_LCC.zip (2.2 KB, 8 views)

Last edited by Rui Assis; December 18th, 2006 at 07:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1992-2005 ReliaSoft Corporation, All Rights Reserved